Gyanendra Kumar Kashyap
Why is it important to communicate with courage, innovation
and discipline...
Sometimes in December 2007, Airtel chose to express itself
differently. “Barriers break when people talk…fences fall when people
talk…walls crumble when people talk,” is how Airtel communicated its
philosophy. For those who were accustomed to the brand’s ‘Express Yourself’
campaign, the new communication was a mere extension keeping in line with the
brand’s philosophy. Apart from students of advertising, the ad campaign has
lessons as to how to effectively use the power of words to communicate. Be it a
mere marketing campaign or an outstanding advertisement, or a powerful sales
pitch, or for that matter an electrifying election campaign; what stands out in
each case is the ‘power of words’ and yes the tone in which they were communicated.
Words, by themselves, have the inherent power to move, inspire, uplift, give
hope to the hopeless; on the contrary they can pull apart, demoralize, hurt,
deflate, destroy and belittle. Words and how they are communicated are powerful
instruments; they can show great wisdom and knowledge or utter stupidity. Communication,
as they say is neither easy nor intuitive. True, it’s one of the most important
skills that we have, but isn’t it equally true that it is this skill that we
happen to screw up the most. Hence, when communicating, care must be taken to
speak empowering and positive words; for negative words can trigger the fight /
flight / freeze response which further leads to reactive, defensive thoughts
and behavior. So much so, organizations have set up ‘corporate communication’
department and have hired PR firms for effective communication with both
internal and external customer / shareholder.
Powerful communication in the political arena have helped leaders build their political careers and have even helped a few swing
the mood of the voters on the penultimate day; on the contrary there have been
instances of leaders who have had to bequeath their chairs, or have had to bear
the unwanted brunt of media criticism when their words are blown out of proportion
(in the Indian context Shashi Tharoor and Narendra Modi are two such examples).
In the organizational context, there have been instances wherein dialogues
between management and employee representatives were unnecessarily prolonged
because of the lack of clarity in communicating their stands. Nearly all of
management issues arise due to lack of effective communication. Chances
regarding misunderstanding and misrepresentation can be minimized together with
proper communication system. Depending on the existing organizational dynamics an
organization and its lead communicators can choose either of the four
communication styles: the listener, the creator, the doer and the thinker. The
listener is an effective communicator because he is steady, understands there
is more than one way to achieve the same results and is willing to listen to
other perspectives. The creator is another effective communicator because he is
enthusiastic, creative and skilled in persuasion. The doer is assertive,
goal-oriented, verbal and competent in problem-solving. The thinker is
analytical, slow to react and contemplative.
Are there returns on investment in effective communication?
A communication ROI report, ‘Capitalizing on Effective Communication’ by Towers
Watson (2009/10) stated that, "Companies that communicate with courage,
innovation and discipline, especially during times of economic challenge and
change, are more effective at engaging employees and achieving desired business
results." Further the report said that most effective communicators had 47
percent higher total returns to shareholders over a five-year span than the
least effective communicators.
The success or failure of an organization clearly depends on
how it communicates. If it wants the barriers of misunderstandings to break /
crumble, it must communicate. Effective communication invariably depends on the
choice of words; communicators on both sides of the table must realize that its
words and words alone that they have to either make or mar.
Dear Gyanendra
ReplyDeletewell written, and I agree with your words, but I would like to point out another dimension to effective communication. Communication is all about dialogue, two ways, where both parties need to engage not only in the expression of their perspective but especially in the active listening of the other. Many a times I have found interlocutors unable to listen or even uninterested in listening, even if on the surface their appears to be a dialogue. I find that the tamas that is still imprisoning our nation plays a big role in this problem.
kindly
Vrata (twitter handle, @aurovrata)